[Errol Morris] é A Wilderness of Error: The Trials of Jeffrey MacDonald [harare PDF] Read Online ¹ proavtomoto.pro

Written By

Errol Morris

[Errol Morris] é A Wilderness of Error: The Trials of Jeffrey MacDonald [harare PDF] Read Online ¹ proavtomoto.pro Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the A Wilderness of Error: The Trials of Jeffrey MacDonald book, this is one of the most wanted Errol Morris author readers around the world.
[Errol Morris] é A Wilderness of Error: The Trials of Jeffrey MacDonald [harare PDF] Read Online ¹ Academy Award Winning Filmmaker And Former Private Detective Errol Morris Examines The Nature Of Evidence And Proof In The Infamous Jeffrey MacDonald Murder Case Early On The Morning Of February , , In Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Jeffrey MacDonald, A Green Beret Doctor, Called The Police For Help When The Officers Arrived At His Home They Found The Bloody And Battered Bodies Of MacDonald S Pregnant Wife And Two Young Daughters The Word Pig Was Written In Blood On The Headboard In The Master Bedroom As MacDonald Was Being Loaded Into The Ambulance, He Accused A Band Of Drug Crazed Hippies Of The CrimeSo Began One Of The Most Notorious And Mysterious Murder Cases Of The Twentieth Century Jeffrey MacDonald Was Finally Convicted InAnd Remains In Prison Today Since Then A Number Of Bestselling books Including Joe McGinniss S Fatal Vision And Janet Malcolm S The Journalist And The Murderer And A Blockbuster Television Miniseries Have Told Their Versions Of The MacDonald Case And What It All MeansErrol Morris Has Been Investigating The MacDonald Case For Over Twenty Years A Wilderness Of Error Is The Culmination Of His Efforts It Is A Shocking Book, Because It Shows Us That Almost Everything We Have Been Told About The Case Is Deeply Unreliable, And Crucial Elements Of The Case Against MacDonald Simply Are Not True It Is A Masterful Reinvention Of The True Crime Thriller, A Book That Pierces The Haze Of Myth Surrounding These Murders With The Sort Of Brilliant Light That Can Only Be Produced By Years Of Dogged And Careful Investigation And Hard, Lucid Thinking By This Book S End, We Know Several Things That There Are Two Very Different Narratives We Can Create About What Happened AtCastle Drive, And That The One That Led To The Conviction And Imprisonment For Life Of This Man For Butchering His Wife And Two Young Daughters Is Almost Certainly Wrong Along The Way Morris Poses Bracing Questions About The Nature Of Proof, Criminal Justice, And The Media, Showing Us How MacDonald Has Been Condemned, Not Only To Prison, But To The Stories That Have Been Created Around Him In This Profoundly original Meditation On Truth And Justice, Errol Morris Reopens One Of America S Most Famous Cases And Forces Us To Confront The Unimaginable Morris Has Spent His Career Unsettling Our Complacent Assumptions That We Know What We Re Looking At, That The Stories We Tell Ourselves Are True This Book Is His Finest And Most Important Achievement To Date This book infuriated me Smoke and mirrors, that s all it was The author doesn t seem to expect that he might have people familiar with the legal system reading this book or he wouldn t try to put forth some of his ideas regarding how the trials were conducted Morris, the author, has turned this case into some kind of grand conspiracy against MacDonald which goes all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States When I first started reading this, I started to want to pick out misleading statements or clear speculation, but it happened so often it would have been overwhelming The author couldn t even spell the name of Kimberly MacDonald correctly, I can t put much faith in his incessant speculation The snarky tone with which he makes all his points is also grating Errol Morris writes this with a tone that if anyone sees the case differently from how he see I have asked myself What does this case mean What is it about Is it about how we trick ourselves into believing that we know something That we have proved something when we have proved nothing It is about how we muddy the waters rather than seek the truth About how we fail to examine the evidence or even look for evidence that could lead us to the truth About how we pick one narrative rather than another for whatever reason and the rest becomes a self fulfilling prophecyUnfortunately, A Wilderness of Error is less a search for truth than it is Morris alternative narrative, which sadly lacks any semblance of objectivity or thoughtful and honest reflection.
After reading Fatal Vision, what has become regarded as the definitive recounting of the Fort Bragg murders in which Dr Jeffrey MacDonald was accused and convicted of brutally murdering his two daughters and pregnant wife, I had hig After a V E R Y slow start, Errol Morris makes a quasi persuasive case for why Dr Jeffrey MacDonald didn t receive a fair trial how the prosecution withheld potentially exculpatory evidence from the defense or how, if the defense knew about it, the defense was not allowed to present it as evidence.
But a fair trial is NOT the same thing as an acquittal As a long time North Carolinian who followed the MacDonald trial in 1979 and who later wrote about the case when I was newspaper reporter in Fayetteville, where Fort Bragg is located I found it very interesting that Morris spends about five pages of his 515 page book examining the very damning blood evidence that convicted MacDonald of killing his wife and two daughters Morris dismisses the blood evidence as not being valid because the defense wasn t given the opportunity to independently examine it adding that plus the crime scene w I was mildly obsessed with Fatal Vision as a teenager I probably read it three or four times between the ages of thirteen and eighteen I picked it up for the first time off the community bookshelf at the motel we were staying at in Florida for summer vacation The first thing that attracted me was that it was a big, thick paperback I was and am a voracious reader Finding a book long enough, that I could really sink my teeth into, was a treasure Secondly, I was drawn in by the description on the back cover An unthinkable crime Who did it Mystery and jumbled facts, but strong hints that Jeffrey MacDonald had killed his family in a psychotic drug fueled rampage I was hooked After reading and re reading it over the yea Since 1985, I have had a long, twisting journey with the Jeffrey MacDonald case It started with Fatal Vision, the miniseries, and progressed to Fatal Vision, the book about the case penned by Joe McGinniss I followed those over time with The Journalist and the Murderer by Janet Malcolm, Fatal Justice by Jerry Allen Potter and Fred Bost and Scales of Justice by Christina Masewicz I visited various websites and read anything I could find about the case Throughout the years my views on the case changed dramatically I penned my changing thoughts here at my book review site In short, I believed MacDonald was guilty but something was off with the case, then there was a great chance that MacDonald was innocent and wrongly imprisoned and, finally, that MacDonald was guilty of the horrible crimes he was convicted of When I heard that filmmaker Errol Morris he of the document I knew and worked with Jeffrey MacDonald He came to my wedding He was a compassionate and caring physician and a wonderful colleague The man who I knew was not the man portrayed in Fatal Vision, and my husband and I never were persuaded that Jeff committed these murders After reading this book, we are evenupset that invesigative ineptitude, insanity his folie a deux suffering in laws , prosecutorial misconduct and the mendacity of witnesses resulted in the destruction of this admirable man Jeff would NEVER have been convicted today on circumstances, innuendo and on the basis of a crime scene that was severely compromised from the get go The contention that he inflicted scores of stab wounds on himself and that he managed to cause a pneumothorax without nicking some other vital organ stretches credulity.
So, here is a man whos This book was a big disappointment Having just read Fatal Vision , I turned to A Wilderness of Error for the other side of the story, expecting a rigorous refutation of McGinniss book, a point by point takedown of the evidence Instead, Wilderness is lost in a wilderness of its own, a rambling, disjointed tract that disappears down philosophical holes and completely glosses over or ignores the most compelling findings from the MacDonald home Oddly, the book, time after time, presents evidence that could, if taken alone, suggests exoneration, but immediately thereafter presents further evidence that refutes the exonerating circumstances, which ends up supporting, rather than destroying, the case against MacDonald A few things that are presented as exculpatory simply aren t And th Poorly reasoned, lacking in substance, episodic and odd Yes, that about sums it up I ve read a lot about this case, butimportantly, I am a lawyer who was once a criminal defense attorney I ve gotta say, this is one of the least convincing exposes I have ever read Let s look at a few things starting with the big reveal on DNA there were 2 DNA samples that didn t match any known persons Two out of many tested One of those was a hair under Mrs McDonald s fingernail Ok, but Morris himself emphasizes over and over again that the crime scene was fatally contaminated by the investigators So, where did the hair come from A careless cop Contamination on clothing leftovers from the many families that lived in military housing before the I finished this book in less than a week, even though it s about 500 pages long I bought it on the first day it came out since I read the other two books about the Jeffrey MacDonald Case Fatal Vision and The Journalist and the Murderer earlier in the summer and the case is still fresh in my mind.
This is a super quick read and a MUST if you ve read in any detail about the MacDonald case Everything you think you know about the case will be overturned If you ve read Fatal Vision, prepare to be slowly convinced that MacDonald s guilt is not nearly as certain as that book makes it seem I started A Wilderness of Error pretty secure in my conviction that MacDonald was guilty, and while I m still not convinced he s innocent I do think his trial was unfair and the investigation was botched from the beginning.
Wilderness of Error is nowhere near